REMARKS TO FOREIGN AFFAIRS, DEFENCE AND TRADE COMMITTEE – 20 FEBRUARY 2025

Remove

Stephen Jacobi presented to the Foreign Affairs, Defence and Trade Select Committee in support of the NZ/UAE Closer Economic Partnership. He emphasised the need for the Government to follow through on undertakings around paperless trade.

read more

SUBMISSION TO THE PARLIAMENTARY FOREIGN AFFAIRS, DEFENCE AND TRADE COMMITTEE – FEBRUARY 2024

by | Feb 19, 2024 | Submissions

Remove

NEW ZEALAND EUROPEAN UNION FREE TRADE AGREEMENT LEGISLATION AMENDMENT BILL

Introduction and Summary

  • This submission is made on behalf of the New Zealand International Business Forum (NZIBF) and Export NZ.  NZIBF is a forum of senior business leaders working together to promote New Zealand’s engagement in the global economy.  Export NZ is a national industry association representing a diverse range of exporters throughout New Zealand. ExportNZ is a division of BusinessNZ, itself a member of NZIBF.
  • Despite continuing concerns about the comprehensiveness of the New Zealand/European Union Free Trade Agreement (“the Agreement”), both NZIBF and Export NZ support the passage of the implementing legislation provided any technical concerns over its provisions can be overcome.  Both NZIBF and Export NZ are concerned that the value of the Agreement could be further lessened by overly restrictive implementation provisions and they urge the Committee to take careful note of the views of affected sectors, including dairy and wine.

About NZIBF

  • NZIBF provides a voice to articulate the needs and priorities of New Zealand’s international business community, and in particular the importance of open markets, to the New Zealand Government and public stakeholders.  The NZIBF Board brings together leaders from amongst New Zealand’s largest internationally oriented companies and peak business organisations representing many exporters of all sizes. (A list of Board Members is in Annex A.)
  • Incorporated in May 2007, NZIBF works with companies, business organisations and government agencies to implement projects in the international trade and economic sphere, including working to develop New Zealand’s key international business relationships and conducting activities to promote New Zealand’s competitiveness. NZIBF receives no direct government funding for its operating budget, but from time to time receives funding for jointly funded projects. Funding in respect to the policy advice and support which NZIBF provides to the New Zealand members of the APEC Business Advisory Council (ABAC) is provided by both NZIBF and the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade (MFAT).

About Export NZ

  • Export NZ is a membership organisation with approximately 2,000 export members around the country.  ExportNZ advocates for, inspires, connects, and celebrates New Zealand exporters. It aims to build a thriving ecosystem that supports each other. “We are exporters helping exporters”.

Past qualified support for the Agreement

  • Both NZIBF and Export NZ, in their previous submissions to the Committee, have expressed qualified support for the Agreement.  This is because the Agreement is less than fully comprehensive and should not therefore be seen as a model for future agreements.  This view has not changed. Further work will continue to be required as the Agreement is implemented and reviewed to enhance its contribution to both trade diversification and the economy more generally. 
  • Both NZIBF and Export NZ recognise however that the Agreement confers advantages to some sectors, including kiwifruit, onions, other horticulture, honey including mānuka, wine, seafood and manufactured products.  These sectors, several of whom especially in the horticulture sector, have seasonal shipments  either underway or about to start, are keen to see the Agreement ratified as soon as possible.  For dairy and beef the additional market access granted under the Agreement is limited.  NZIBF and Export NZ continue to urges the Government to seek to improve market access for dairy and beef as the opportunity arises.
  • Both NZIBF and Export NZ remain concerned that growing EU regulation of sustainability could further undermine the value of the Agreement.  The unilateral imposition of such regulation has the potential to impact trade significantly, with one example being the EU’s Deforestation Free Supply Chain Regulation. As it is currently drafted, New Zealand’s beef and leather trade to the EU could cease when the regulation comes into force in December. New Zealand needs to be proactive in using the consultative mechanisms in the FTA to discuss these matters.

Implementing legislation

  • The draft legislation currently before the Committee serves to give effect to the agreement reached between New Zealand and the EU in July 2023. To oppose the legislation outright would be to prevent the Agreement taking effect and the benefits being extended to the sectors as outlined above.  For this reason both NZIBF and Export NZ support in principle he passage of this legislation despite their reservations about the Agreement as a whole.   That said, much of the legislation is highly detailed and technical.  This applies particularly to the provisions in Part 3 concerning the implementation of an expanded regime for geographical indications (GIs).  Both NZIBF and Export NZ urge the Committee to take careful note of the views of industries, such as dairy and wine, who will be directly affected by these measures.
  • It is our view however that the provisions related to GIs should go no further than what is required to implement the specific requirements of the NZ-EU FTA and should align with New Zealand’s existing legal system for the protection of intellectual property rights.  We are concerned that several GI-related enforcement provisions extend far beyond this, placing a significant burden on New Zealand food and wine producers. For example, the Bill establishes an enforcement system with GI officers that are granted unjustified and far-reaching powers; there are no credible limitations on persons that can take civil actions under the New Zealand court system; and financial remedies are set at levels that create a high risk of misuse and risk deterring legitimate users of terms not covered by GI protections.  Furthermore we consider there must be a proper consultation and opposition process around any new names before they are added to the register or to Annex 28-B of the FTA, and the provisions to protect common names – or shield them from the protections of the proposed legislation – must be further clarified.
  • Both NZIBF and Export NZ support the provisions in Part 5 which will enable EU investors to benefit from the same screening threshold, NZ$200 million, applied to many of New Zealand’s other FTA partners, including CPTPP Parties, China, Korea and the UK.

Conclusion

  • The Agreement is different from others New Zealand has concluded in the less than comprehensive market access coverage and the larger number of concessions New Zealand has to make in its own domestic policy settings, including GIs. While both NZIBF and Export NZ have continuing concerns about aspects of the Agreement, opposing the implementing legislation at this stage would mean the loss of the gains that have been made for some sectors and send a negative signal about New Zealand’s reliability as a negotiating partner.

Recommendations to the Committee

  • NZIBF recommends that the Committee:
  1. note that NZIBF and Export NZ support the passage of the NZ/EU Free Trade Agreement Legislation Amendment Bill provided any technical concerns highlighted by affected industries can be overcome
  2. note that the sectors benefiting from the Agreement would be assisted by prompt implementation of the Agreement.

REGISTER WITH TRADE WORKS

Register to stay up to date with latest news, as well as saving and discussing articles you’re interested in.

 

Remove

 

Latest News

SOUTHERN LINK REVISITED SEMINAR, SEPT 2024

On 24 September 2024 a stakeholders seminar was held in Auckland to reassess the Southern Link concept, five years after a large conference kickstarted focused discussion of the idea (before Covid intervened).   This report of the seminar discussions...

T Day has come

STOP PRESS – NOT SO FAST.  This post deals with the tariffs President Trump announced on 1 February he would impose on Canada, Mexico and China.  By 4 February he announced imposition of tariffs on Canada and Mexico would be suspended for 30 days (until 5 March). ...

Back to the future?

The end of 2024 has trade advocates reaching back to their 2016 taking points as an Administration of a depressingly protectionist hue prepares to take office in the United States, once the global champion for trade liberalisation.  We do not know for now what,...

NZIBF 2024 Chair Report

I am pleased to present my fourth report on the activities and achievements of the NZ International Business Forum (NZIBF) for 2023-24, our 17th year of operations.  I am grateful to all Board and associate Members for your continuing commitment and support. This...

THE NEXT BIG IDEA – THE SOUTHERN LINK

If New Zealand is serious about doubling export value in the next ten years then we need some really big, new ideas.  Doing more of the same, not that there is anything wrong with that, is just going to deliver the same result.  Enter an idea whose time has...

TIES THAT BIND – EXPANDING CER TO ASEAN

For New Zealand to pay more attention to the economies of ASEAN (the ten-member Association of South East Asian nations) makes sense, particularly at a time when doing business around the world is tough and when we need all of our international connections to deliver...