Agricultural subsidies by OECD members and major emerging economies have reached the level of USD 851 billion a year. They are not only financially wasteful, they are distorting global trade and impacting negatively on the environment. Some new research casts light on this perennial problem for NZ dairy trade. We need some creative thinking to level the playing field. NZIBF Executive Director Stephen Jacobi writes a blog for TradeWorks.
Data needed in TPP debate Dominion Post – 25 February 2014
![news](https://www.tradeworks.org.nz/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/Report.jpg)
By Stephen Jacobi
In his recent article calling into question international research on the possible benefits of the Trans Pacific Partnership (TPP), Simon Terry of the Sustainability Council asks why there is reluctance to discuss the overall costs and benefits. In fact the NZ US Council drew attention to the quantitative study on TPP back in May 2012. We even asked the New Zealand Institute of Economic Research (NZIER) to assess the research methodology and findings in relation to New Zealand.
One problem in evaluating the costs and benefits of trade agreements is that the full extent of future liberalisation is unknown before they are actually signed. That’s why the original study’s authors, Peter Petri, Michael Plummer and Fan Zhai, actually modeled several scenarios. This is a standard practice by research economists and the study and the accompanying website which is continually updated ? www.asiapacifictrade.org – has a wealth of background data and related material.
The Sustainability Council has now produced its own research which is limited to criticizing the modeling used in the Petri et al study. No alternative modeling nor any new data are offered to provide evidence for a different perspective.
Simon Terry and Geoff Bertram, the report’s authors, suggest the benefits are “less than a quarter” of those claimed, but offer no detail about this calculation. In fact the “readily visible costs” they identify appear to be more in the nature of philosophical objections than quantifiable indicators.
The report refers to the potential extension of intellectual property rights in TPP and claims these as adding costs. Unfortunately no economic modeling of these costs is presented and no new analysis of the economic wealth generated by the IP rights that New Zealand creators of advanced health care systems, environmental technologies, movies or other media currently enjoy. The assertion of costs is based on leaked text regardless of how this draft text might be adjusted in the final agreement.
On investor state dispute settlement, the report again defaults to generic statements with little actual evidence. Investor state dispute settlement is likely to figure in the final TPP as it has done in earlier agreements New Zealand has signed including with China and ASEAN. Trade Minister Groser is on record as saying that this will not compromise New Zealand’s ability to regulate in the areas of public health (including tobacco packaging), the environment, or the Treaty of Waitangi. Here again the Sustainability Council report offers no economic analysis to back up their claims nor an estimation of the benefits that New Zealand investors overseas including Fisher and Paykel Appliances, Fonterra and Zespri can expect to obtain when their investments are protected overseas.
The Sustainability Council suggests the benefits of TPP should be confined to tariff cuts. But that’s not even half the picture. It is not just empirical literature that suggests there are gains from reducing non-tariff barriers and easing impediments to investment ? this is something that is continually being stressed by New Zealand businesses operating in international markets. Non-tariff, behind-the-border dimensions to trade agreements are admittedly difficult to measure but that is no reason for ignoring them.
Trade policy today is mostly not about tariffs. The vast bulk of the world’s wealth today is generated by trade in services, not goods. Finding ways to speed up the movement of goods through supply chains and reduce costs may be even more significant than reductions in duties and taxes.
The final word on TPP will need to wait until the text is released. The Sustainability Council wants that to happen now. The NZ US Council wants to wait until the negotiation is concluded. Readers are at liberty to make up their own minds about this.
In the meantime those supporting TPP are very happy to have a respectful conversation with the Sustainability Council and others who hold different views. We stand by the Petri study, which appears to us to have used robust methodology, in the knowledge that these figures are estimations, albeit well-founded ones.
REGISTER WITH TRADE WORKS
Register to stay up to date with latest news, as well as saving and discussing articles you’re interested in.
Latest News
SPOTLIGHT ON SUBSIDIES
With much of the world turning inwards and the World Trade Organisation (WTO) in a parlous state, it could be tempting to relax New Zealand’s long-term struggle to rid the world of trade-distorting, environmentally harmful and financially wasteful subsidies. Not...
Address to NZ Apples and Pears Inc Conference, 30 July
GEO-POLITICAL, TRADE AND CONSUMER UPDATE Stephen Jacobi, Executive Director, NZ International Business Forum Introduction Thanks to the team at NZ Apples and Pears for the invitation to be with you today. I’m here to talk about the bigger picture against which your...
NON TARIFF BARRIERS – “YOU ARE NOT ALONE”
Non- tariff barriers (NTBS) have a pernicious effect on trade. Sometimes it seems that just as tariffs go down, an NTB springs up! They can be hard to identify and even harder to address. The red meat industry, New Zealand’s second largest export...
INTERNATIONAL TREATY EXAMINATION OF THE AGREEMENT ON THE INDO-PACIFIC ECONOMIC FRAMEWORK FOR PROSPERITY
SUBMISSION TO THE FOREIGN AFFAIRS, DEFENCE AND TRADE SELECT COMMITTEE - JULY 2024 Introduction This submission is made on behalf of the New Zealand International Business Forum (NZIBF) and ExportNZ. NZIBF, whose members are listed at Annex A,[1] is a forum of...
Sourcing from the world’s factory – new research report into imports from China
There are very few strategic risks to New Zealand from our current levels of exposure to imports from China, concludes a new report from the New Zealand China Council, co-sponsored by NZIBF. Even if we were to diversify our sources, China is now so...
ADDRESS TO THE 54TH ONE STOP UPDATE FOR THE ACCOUNTANT IN BUSINESS – GLOBAL ECONOMIC UPDATE
AUCKLAND, WELLINGTON, CHRISTCHURCH, MAY 2024 STEPHEN JACOBI, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR - NZ INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS FORUM Introduction Thanks once again to Brightstar for the opportunity to address you today. I’m sorry I can’t be with you in person as I am travelling...
APEC Ministers Responsible for Trade Joint Statement 2024
2024 APEC Ministers Responsible for Trade Joint Statement Arequipa, Peru | 18 May 2024 We, the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) Ministers Responsible for Trade (MRT), met in Arequipa, Peru on 17-18 May 2024, chaired by Peru’s Minister of Foreign Trade and...
Business Forum welcomes UAE FTA negotiations
Media release, 7 May 2024 The NZ International Business Forum (NZIBF) welcomes the start of formal negotiations on the New Zealand/UAE Closer Economic Partnership Agreement (CEPA) and looks forward to steady progress that will lead to the securing of a comprehensive...
Doubling our exports with zeroes…and ones!
The development of written language in the ancient world didn’t start with great poetry or literary epics. The catalyst for writing was the need to record the transfer of the ownership of goods from one person to another. Scribes did this by marking tablets of clay...
Asia-Pacific business leaders rally for robust global trade amidst rising protectionism
APEC NEWS RELEASE Issued by The APEC Business Advisory Council (ABAC) - April 2024 This week in Hong Kong, China, the APEC Business Advisory Council (ABAC) voiced serious concerns regarding the global shift towards protectionism and regional fragmentation, risking...
SUBMISSION TO THE MINISTRY OF FOREIGN AFFAIRS AND TRADE – APRIL 2024
NEW ZEALAND-UAE COMPREHENSIVE ECONOMIC PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT NEGOTIATIONS This submission is made on behalf of the New Zealand International Business Forum (NZIBF), whose members are listed at Annex A[1]. NZIBF is a forum of senior business leaders working together...
NEW TEAM FOR AUSTRALIA NEW ZEALAND LEADERSHIP FORUM
Media release, 2 April 2024 The New Zealand Co-Chair of the Australia New Zealand Leadership Forum (ANZLF), Greg Lowe, welcomes the appointment of Stephen Jacobi and Simon Le Quesne to the New Zealand arm of the ANZLF Secretariat. The ANZLF brings business leaders,...
NZ/EU FTA A BONUS FOR SOME SECTORS – BUSINESS FORUM
Media release, 22 March 2024 The NZ International Business Forum (NZIBF) acknowledges the passage of the implementing legislation for the New Zealand/European Union Free Trade Agreement and looks forward to the FTA’s entry into force on 1 May. “This agreement was...
“MEAGRE OUTCOME” FROM WTO IN ABU DHABI – BUSINESS FORUM
Media release, 2 March 2024 Despite its overwhelming importance at the heart of the international trade system, members of the World Trade Organisation (WTO) have concluded their Ministerial in Abu Dhabi (“MC13”) with only a meagre outcome. NZ International Business...
To go or woe with the WTO?
We’ve been here before with the World Trade Organisation (WTO). The global trade body’s 13th Ministerial meeting (“MC13”) opens in Abu Dhabi on Monday 26 February, with Trade Minister McClay serving as Vice-Chair. In recent weeks diplomats, trade...