Executive Director of NZIBF Stephen Jacobi discusses NTBs at the Red Meat Sector Conference.
Remarks to NZIIA “Law of the Jungle” Conference
![speech_bubble_wide](https://www.tradeworks.org.nz/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/Speech_Bubble_Wide.jpg)
REMARKS TO NZIIA “LAW OF THE JUNGLE” CONFERENCE
WELLINGTON, 27 FEBRUARY 2018
STEPHEN JACOBI, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR
NZ INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS FORUM
NZ CHINA COUNCIL
WORLD ECONOMY AND TRADE: IS ASIA RE-INVENTING THE RULES?
Thanks very much for the invitation to join this distinguished panel and congratulations to NZIIA for having the foresight to organise this timely conference.
Way back in 2003, after the World Trade Organisation Doha Round had finally emerged after the debacle of the riots in Seattle, an organisation I was involved with launched a public communication campaign around the theme “Trade Rules OK”.
The idea was to ferment spontaneous public outpourings of support for the multilateral trading system – we didn’t quite unleash the hordes of pro-trade protesters on Lambton Quay but the catch phrase was quite nifty.
Trade rules are ok, especially for small, open economies like New Zealand, and certainly preferable to the law of the jungle.
It’s strange how things come around – we are meeting at a time once again when there is a new questioning, especially by one large and influential economy, about the efficacy of the rules underpinning global trade and investment, and where people all over the world are demanding that this system work better for all.
It would be far better of course to seek to address these concerns in the WTO, if only there were the political will to do so – it’s not just because there is a former New Zealand Ambassador to the WTO on this panel that I say that the WTO is and always must be our top trade priority.
At the same time, here in “greater Asia”, if I can associate New Zealand in that way, there is no let up in the quest for a better, more effective framework for trade and investment – a new fellowship has just completed CPTPP, RCEP lumbers on with deadlines constantly adjusted, the Pacific Alliance is reaching across the Pacific, FTAAP remains a distant vision for APEC and bilateral FTAs continue to be concluded.
It was the Obama Administration, which, faced with wavering Congressional support for the original TPP, first drew attention to the risks for the United States of being left out of this trade liberalisation frenzy – “if we don’t write the rules, others will” .
(That was back when trade rules were ok for the United States, unlike today).
The fact of the matter is that prior to the Trump Administration’s withdrawal from TPP it was hard to see that rules were being written in Asia.
RCEP was nowhere near TPP either in terms of substance or timetable and certainly China was not, and still does not appear to be, in the driving seat as is often claimed – RCEP is definitely ASEAN’s baby.
China actively championed the Free Trade Area of the Asia Pacific (FTAAP) during its APEC year in 2014, but APEC wheels grind slowly, in a voluntary and non-binding way, and FTAAP, while a hugely important vision, is most unlikely to be realised in the form of a single-undertaking FTA.
Others in region including our friends Japan and China have also negotiated a number of bilateral FTAs,
From a business perspective, trade and investment these days is increasingly driven by complex value chains and networks, the emphasis needs to be on greater coherence between agreements.
There is also the need to address those “next generation” issues that speak to the needs of today’s economy particularly in the area of services and digital trade and linking smaller business to those value chains.
That was, and still is, the great attraction of TPP, which, although it took a long time to deliver, was conceived with this idea in mind.
And hence that great sucking sound, a collective intake of business and government breath, when on 23January 2017 the United States withdrew from TPP.
It pains me deeply to say this but ifyou want to pick a date when it became clear that others would start to re-invent the rules of trade it was that day.
And the proof is there – in CPTPP, stripped of 22 mostly US-inspired rules from the earlier agreement; in the willingness on the part of others to continue with other negotiations; and, yes, in China’s re-positioning of itself as the new leader of globalisation.
Nature abhors a vacuum and so does trade.
In Asia today we see a continuation of conventional rule-writing through FTAs as well as the emergence of a new approaches to fostering economic integration.
Chief among these is China’s Belt and Road Initiative (BRI).
BRI is not a trade negotiation, nor does it seek to write binding trade rules, and it is most usually associated with infrastructure, but it does seek to promote greater connectivity amongst the 69 or so participants.
BRI is a work in progress and is an ambitious vision – nor is it without its sceptics and critics – some of them are in this room!
But to the extent that BRI establishes a framework for exploring mechanisms between participants to draw closer together economically, it could provide an alternative way to fashion greater co-operation in areas like trade facilitation, supply chain connectivity and regulatory coherence.
In both conventional and new ways, therefore, I think it fair to conclude that Asia is now beginning to rei-nvent the rules and this will continue for as long as other settings, including the all-important multilateral system, remain blocked.
Let me finish with a word about New Zealand.
I said at the outset that small, open economies rely on the rule of trade law to avoid getting trampled by larger partners.
This is not an abstract or theoretical thing: New Zealand has taken several cases to the WTO and we have never lost – nor has our own trade regime ever been challenged, long may that continue!
Our interests are best served when we have a hand in making the rules that affect us and when we stick to those rules.
Our sovereignty is upheld when we can have confidence that others – even some of our best friends – will not use their economic power to restrict our ambitions for trade and investment.
That’s why New Zealand must play in all trade games – the conventional ones and the new approaches.
That’s why trade rules are indeed ok, and why we need to continue to work to help re-invent them, write them and, above all, to uphold them.
REGISTER WITH TRADE WORKS
Register to stay up to date with latest news, as well as saving and discussing articles you’re interested in.
Latest News
NON TARIFF BARRIERS – “YOU ARE NOT ALONE”
Non- tariff barriers (NTBS) have a pernicious effect on trade. Sometimes it seems that just as tariffs go down, an NTB springs up! They can be hard to identify and even harder to address. The red meat industry, New Zealand’s second largest export...
INTERNATIONAL TREATY EXAMINATION OF THE AGREEMENT ON THE INDO-PACIFIC ECONOMIC FRAMEWORK FOR PROSPERITY
SUBMISSION TO THE FOREIGN AFFAIRS, DEFENCE AND TRADE SELECT COMMITTEE - JULY 2024 Introduction This submission is made on behalf of the New Zealand International Business Forum (NZIBF) and ExportNZ. NZIBF, whose members are listed at Annex A,[1] is a forum of...
Sourcing from the world’s factory – new research report into imports from China
There are very few strategic risks to New Zealand from our current levels of exposure to imports from China, concludes a new report from the New Zealand China Council, co-sponsored by NZIBF. Even if we were to diversify our sources, China is now so...
ADDRESS TO THE 54TH ONE STOP UPDATE FOR THE ACCOUNTANT IN BUSINESS – GLOBAL ECONOMIC UPDATE
AUCKLAND, WELLINGTON, CHRISTCHURCH, MAY 2024 STEPHEN JACOBI, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR - NZ INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS FORUM Introduction Thanks once again to Brightstar for the opportunity to address you today. I’m sorry I can’t be with you in person as I am travelling...
APEC Ministers Responsible for Trade Joint Statement 2024
2024 APEC Ministers Responsible for Trade Joint Statement Arequipa, Peru | 18 May 2024 We, the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) Ministers Responsible for Trade (MRT), met in Arequipa, Peru on 17-18 May 2024, chaired by Peru’s Minister of Foreign Trade and...
Business Forum welcomes UAE FTA negotiations
Media release, 7 May 2024 The NZ International Business Forum (NZIBF) welcomes the start of formal negotiations on the New Zealand/UAE Closer Economic Partnership Agreement (CEPA) and looks forward to steady progress that will lead to the securing of a comprehensive...
Doubling our exports with zeroes…and ones!
The development of written language in the ancient world didn’t start with great poetry or literary epics. The catalyst for writing was the need to record the transfer of the ownership of goods from one person to another. Scribes did this by marking tablets of clay...
Asia-Pacific business leaders rally for robust global trade amidst rising protectionism
APEC NEWS RELEASE Issued by The APEC Business Advisory Council (ABAC) - April 2024 This week in Hong Kong, China, the APEC Business Advisory Council (ABAC) voiced serious concerns regarding the global shift towards protectionism and regional fragmentation, risking...
SUBMISSION TO THE MINISTRY OF FOREIGN AFFAIRS AND TRADE – APRIL 2024
NEW ZEALAND-UAE COMPREHENSIVE ECONOMIC PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT NEGOTIATIONS This submission is made on behalf of the New Zealand International Business Forum (NZIBF), whose members are listed at Annex A[1]. NZIBF is a forum of senior business leaders working together...
NEW TEAM FOR AUSTRALIA NEW ZEALAND LEADERSHIP FORUM
Media release, 2 April 2024 The New Zealand Co-Chair of the Australia New Zealand Leadership Forum (ANZLF), Greg Lowe, welcomes the appointment of Stephen Jacobi and Simon Le Quesne to the New Zealand arm of the ANZLF Secretariat. The ANZLF brings business leaders,...
NZ/EU FTA A BONUS FOR SOME SECTORS – BUSINESS FORUM
Media release, 22 March 2024 The NZ International Business Forum (NZIBF) acknowledges the passage of the implementing legislation for the New Zealand/European Union Free Trade Agreement and looks forward to the FTA’s entry into force on 1 May. “This agreement was...
“MEAGRE OUTCOME” FROM WTO IN ABU DHABI – BUSINESS FORUM
Media release, 2 March 2024 Despite its overwhelming importance at the heart of the international trade system, members of the World Trade Organisation (WTO) have concluded their Ministerial in Abu Dhabi (“MC13”) with only a meagre outcome. NZ International Business...
To go or woe with the WTO?
We’ve been here before with the World Trade Organisation (WTO). The global trade body’s 13th Ministerial meeting (“MC13”) opens in Abu Dhabi on Monday 26 February, with Trade Minister McClay serving as Vice-Chair. In recent weeks diplomats, trade...
DCANZ – Agricultural Subsidy Distortions Must Be Addressed
23 February 2024 - Media Release by the Dairy Companies Association of New Zealand (DCANZ) As the world’s Trade Ministers head to a WTO meeting in Abu Dhabi, the Dairy Companies Association of New Zealand (DCANZ) is calling for an immediate capping of agricultural...
Asia-Pacific business leaders call for greater economic dynamism with people at the center of the APEC agenda
16 February 2024 - APEC NEWS RELEASE Issued by The APEC Business Advisory Council (ABAC) The APEC Business Advisory Council (ABAC), meeting this week in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, expressed deep concerns about the growing pressures of economic fragmentation and the risks...